Presentation - Solo Theatre Piece Assessment Rubric

External assessment criteria—HL only

Summary

Task 1: Solo theatre piece (HL only)MarksTotal
  A Theatre in context: The theorist, the theory and the contexts 8 32
  B Theatre processes: Practical explorations of the aspect(s) of theory and the development of the solo theatre piece 8
  C Presenting theatre: Theatre theory in practice 8
  D Presenting theatre: Evaluation of the solo theatre piece and reflections 8

Criteria

A. Theatre in context: The theorist, the theory and the contexts

Evidence: report

  • To what extent does the student research the context(s) of the theatre theorist and their theories?
  • To what extent does the student demonstrate an understanding of the selected aspect(s) of theatre theory?
  • To what extent have primary and secondary sources been selected and used?
MarkDescriptor
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2

This work is inconsistent:

  • the student’s observations of the context(s) of the theorist and the selected aspect(s) of theory are derivative and superficial
  • the student uses few appropriate primary or secondary sources, not always effectively.
3–4

This work is underdeveloped:

  • the student identifies and describes the context(s) of the theorist and the selected aspect(s) of theory
  • the student uses limited primary and secondary sources effectively.
5–6

This work is good:

  • the student identifies and explains the context(s) of the theorist and the selected aspect(s) of theory
  • the student uses appropriate primary and secondary source, not always effectively.
7–8

This work is excellent:

  • the student identifies, explains and analyses the context(s) of the theorist and the selected aspect(s) of theory
  • the student uses a range of appropriate primary and secondary sources effectively.
B. Theatre processes: Practical explorations of the aspect(s) of theory and the development of the solo theatre piece

Evidence: report

  • To what extent does the student demonstrate a thorough understanding of the process of creation in their approach to practically exploring the selected aspect(s) of theatre theory?
  • To what extent does the student explain their vision for the final piece and the process of creating their solo performance?
  • To what extent does the student reflect on feedback from their teacher, peer mentor or theatre class, explaining the impact this has had on their work?
MarkDescriptor
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2

This work is inconsistent:

  • the student explores the theory employing few appropriate or relevant practical techniques, outlining some of the approach or choices
  • the student lists feedback and actions they have taken in response to it.
3–4

This work is underdeveloped:

  • the student explores the theory employing some appropriate and relevant practical techniques, outlining their particular approach and choices in relation to their stated intentions
  • the student discusses feedback and the action they have taken in response to it.
5–6

This work is good:

  • the student explores the theory employing a range of appropriate and relevant practical techniques, describing their particular approach and choices in relation to their stated intentions
  • the student evaluates feedback, the impact this has had on their work and the action they have taken.
7–8

This work is excellent:

  • the student explores the theory employing a range of carefully selected, appropriate and relevant practical techniques, explaining and justifying their particular approach and choices in relation to their stated intentions
  • the student reflects on feedback and evaluates the impact this has had on their work and the action they have taken.
C. Presenting theatre: Theatre theory in practice

Evidence: video recording and report

  • To what extent does the student apply techniques and approaches appropriate to the selected aspect(s) of theory and the student’s stated intentions?
  • To what extent does the student demonstrate synthesis between the presented theatrical elements and the selected aspect(s) of theory?
  • To what extent does the student realise their intentions in the practical exploration of selected aspect(s) of theatre theory?
MarkDescriptor
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2

This work is inconsistent:

  • the theatrical techniques employed by the student are superficial or inappropriate
  • the student’s practical application of the selected aspect(s) of theory is limited and does not relate to their stated intentions.
3–4

This work is underdeveloped:

  • the student employs some theatrical techniques to present the selected aspect(s) of theory in practice but these are not always appropriate or relevant
  • the student’s practical application of the selected aspect(s) of theory is not sustained or inconsistent in relation to their stated intentions.
5–6

This work is good:

  • the student employs appropriate theatrical techniques to present the selected aspect(s) of theory in practice
  • the student demonstrates a sustained practical application of the selected aspect(s) of theory which appropriately fulfills their stated intentions.
7–8

This work is excellent:

  • the student employs appropriate and effective theatrical techniques to present the selected aspect(s) of theory in practice
  • the student demonstrates a sustained and highly effective practical application of the selected aspect(s) of theory which clearly and appropriately fulfills their stated intentions.
D. Presenting theatre: Evaluation of the solo theatre piece and reflections

Evidence: report

  • To what extent does the student evaluate the final presentation of the solo theatre piece and consider the extent to which their intentions were met?
  • To what extent does the student evaluate the impact their solo theatre piece had on the audience?
  • To what extent does the student reflect on what they have learned through the experience of creating the solo theatre piece and the implications this has for their work in theatre?
MarkDescriptor
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2

This work is inconsistent:

  • the student outlines the presented solo theatre piece with little consideration of the extent to which their intentions were met
  • the student lists challenges faced with no consideration of personal discoveries.
3–4

This work is underdeveloped:

  • the student considers the extent to which their intentions were met in the presented solo theatre piece
  • the student outlines challenges faced or their own personal discoveries.
5–6

This work is good:

  • the student evaluates the presented solo theatre piece and considers the extent to which their intentions were met with some clarity
  • the student describes challenges faced and their own personal discoveries.
7–8

This work is excellent:

  • the student provides a thorough and effective evaluation of the presented solo theatre piece, carefully considering the extent to which their intentions were met
  • the student reflects on challenges faced and their own personal discoveries.
Last modified: Monday, 17 August 2015, 2:46 PM