Task details - Solo Theatre Piece
Task details
Selecting the theatre theorist and theory
Students at HL identify a theatre theorist they have not previously studied who has developed and contributed to theatre theory. Students should have little or no previous experience of researching or practically engaging with the theatre theorist or aspect(s) of theory they select for study.
It is important that the theatre theorist selected has made a significant contribution to theatre and that their theories are documented and publicly available. Published or recorded material of the theorist’s actual words communicating their theatre theory must exist.
Students must ensure that the theory they select is related to theatrical theory, rather than to social, psychological, literary, historical or cultural theory. In some cases it may be necessary to consider other theories alongside the theatre theory, with theorists such as Augusto Boal (b.1931), for example, whose theatre theory cannot be considered without exploring the wider political components of his work. However, this must be clearly justified in the report.
Use of sources
For this task the student should consult both primary (the theorist’s own published or recorded words) and secondary sources related to the theatre theorist and their theories. The suitability and range of the sources will depend on the theorist and the nature of their theory. As well as the more obvious sources (books, websites, videos, DVDs, articles) research may also include live experiences/encounters such as workshops, lectures, correspondence or interview with an expert and performances. All sources consulted must be cited following the protocol of the referencing style chosen by the school and submitted alongside the text of the report.
Performance material
For their solo theatre piece, students may choose to use or adapt existing text, create new text or not use any text, as appropriate to the selected theorist and nature of the theory being explored. If using a play text, this does not necessarily need to be from a play written specifically to put that theatre theorist’s theories into practice. For example, a student would not need to choose a play by Bertolt Brecht (b.1898) in order to explore an aspect of Epic theatre, they could, perhaps, choose to adapt a Naturalistic play text instead. If using a play text, this does not need to be one continuous speech but may be a number of sections of text woven together by the student.
Designing and directing
Students must approach this task from the perspective of performer but must also make their own design and directorial choices. These will depend on their intentions and should be appropriate to the chosen theatre theorist and the nature of the theory being explored. Although students may need to design and source specific technical or scenic elements for their theatre piece these do not need to be made or operated by the student. A student who wishes to include an original sequence of music or projection in their theatre piece, for example, will be expected to design and stipulate the nature, duration and style of the music or footage required. It is acceptable, however, for someone else to capture, assemble and edit the material under the direction of the student, as well as operate any technology required to play back the original material for the theatre piece. This applies to scenic design elements (such as costume make-up, props and set) and technical design elements (such as lighting, projection and sound). Where found material is used, students must be sure to state the source of the material and acknowledge the individuals involved in its creation. Students should record all decisions made relating to the technical elements of the theatre piece in their theatre journals and address them in the submitted report, following the protocol of the referencing style chosen by the school and copyright legislation.
Supporting the creative process
Solo performers rarely work in isolation. During the rehearsal and development process for this task students are permitted to seek support and feedback from peer “mentors” (and in turn the student may work in the role of mentor for others). The role of the peer mentor should be to ask questions and to challenge the student to be clearer in the formulation, development and expression of their creative ideas. This may involve question and answer sessions, support with learning lines, gaining feedback on extracts of the theatre piece and other structured coaching activities. Key interactions with peer mentors (who may or may not be members of the IB theatre class) must be clearly recorded in the theatre journal and addressed in the report where the student must reflect on how this support has impacted the development of their piece.
Technical support
The students may receive support in preparing and operating technical equipment during the theatre piece. They must have designed and stipulated the nature of these technical elements independently even if they do not operate the technical equipment or make the scenic elements.
Other performers
This is an individual assessment task which requires the student to present a solo theatre piece. Other performers are not permitted to appear in any part of the final presentation of the solo theatre piece.
Requirements of the video recording
The video recording must be a continuous, unedited record and must capture the full theatre piece. The video camera must not be switched off at any point during the presentation. More information and guidance on the video recording of internal and external assessments can be found in the Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme.
The role of the teacher
Teachers must ensure that their students are appropriately prepared for the demands of this task through the careful planning and delivery of the core syllabus activities outlined above .
While students are working on the assessment task the teacher should:
- discuss each student’s choice of theatre theorist and the aspect(s) of theory selected with them; it is important that the theatre theorist selected is each student’s own choice
- give feedback once only following the presentation of a work-in-progress version of the solo theatre piece; each student must clearly record this feedback in both the theatre journal and subsequent report; each student must reflect on the impact that this support has made on the development of the piece
- give feedback on one draft of the report.
Teachers are not permitted to direct any part of the assessed task.
During the assessment task the teacher should assist with video recording the solo theatre piece to ensure it accurately captures the assessment task. In preparing to video record the assessed solo theatre piece teachers are encouraged to allow students time to walk through their presentation prior to filming to give the video camera operator an indication of how the space will be used and the most appropriate way of framing each section.
Examples of possible theatre theorists, theories and solo theatre pieces
The table below outlines possible ways in which theatre theorists and their theories could feasibly form the basis of a solo theatre piece. The table also identifies examples of primary and secondary sources for these theorists. These examples are for guidance only and are neither prescriptive nor restrictive.
Theorist | Primary and secondary sources | Aspect(s) of theory | Potential theatre piece |
---|---|---|---|
Robert Lepage (b.1957) |
Interview: “Connecting Flights” (1999) Book: The Theatricality of Robert Lepage by Aleksandar Sasa Dundjerović (2007) |
Film projection | Solo theatre presentation of a monologue about the tsunami. Created, directed and performed by the student using film projection designed by the student. |
Zeami Motokiyo (b.1363) |
Book: On the Art of No Drama translated by Yamazaki and Rimer (1984) Book: Zeami: Performance Notesby Zeami and Hare (2011) |
Quality of movement | Solo presentation of the dance fromHagoromo (The Feather Robe). Directed and performed by the student with costume designed by the student. |
Konstantin Stanlislavksi (b.1863) |
Book: An Actor Prepares (1936) Book: Stanislavski and the Actor by Jean Benedetti (1998) |
Concentration and circles of attention | Solo presentation of a monologue from The Dream Play by Strindberg. Directed and performed with costume design by the student. |
Julie Taymor (b.1952) |
Book: Julie Taymor: Playing with Fire by Blumenthal, Taymor and Monda (2007) Book: The Reemergence of Mythology, Fantasy and Fable by Sabrina Stewart (2009) |
Puppetry and storytelling | Solo presentation of one of Aesop’s fables adapted for the stage. Directed and performed by the student using puppets. |
Robert Wilson (b.1941) |
Lecture: “1. Have you been here before? 2. No this is the first time” (2008) Book: Robert Wilson: From Within by Margery Arent Safir (2011) |
Use of light | Solo presentation of an original piece of theatre without words based on Macbethby Shakespeare. Directed and performed by the student using lighting designed by the student. |
Structuring the report
The report, which can be up to 3,000 words in length, should adopt a formal, academic register but should be written in the first person, where appropriate, presenting the student’s personal discoveries, explorations, creation and the analysis of their theatre piece.
The student may use any relevant illustrations, annotated text, charts, mind maps, visuals, diagrams, or designs considered necessary. These must be clearly annotated and appropriately referenced to acknowledge the source, following the protocol of the referencing style chosen by the school. When students include any of their own photographs or images, these must also be identified and acknowledged in the same way. Any text that appears within a visual does not count as part of the word limit. There is no lower limit on the number of words a student can submit for this task and teachers are encouraged to remind students that their work will be assessed on how it best fulfills the assessment criteria for the task and not judged on how many words are submitted.
The report should contain a table of contents (which is excluded from the word count) and all pages should be numbered. The main body of the report should be structured using the following subheadings:
- The theorist, the theory and the contexts
- Practical explorations and development of the solo theatre piece
- Evaluation of the solo theatre piece and my personal reflections
Students are required to submit a separate list of all sources cited.
The size and format of pages submitted for assessment is not prescribed. Submitted materials are assessed on screen and students must ensure that their work is clear and legible when presented in a digital, on-screen format. To ensure that examiners are able to gain an overall and legible impression of each page without excessive scrolling, students are recommended to use common page sizes (such as legal, A4 or folio). Overcrowded or illegible materials may result in examiners being unable to interpret and understand the intentions of the work.
Formal requirements of the task
Each student submits for assessment:
- a report (3,000 words maximum) which includes:
- the student’s research and understandings regarding the theorist, the theory and the context of the theorist’s work
- the student’s practical explorations of the selected aspect(s) of the theory and the development of the solo theatre piece
- the student’s analysis and evaluation of the presentation of the solo theatre piece
- a continuous unedited video recording of the whole solo theatre piece (4–8 minutes)
- a list of all primary and secondary sources cited.
The procedure for submitting the assessment materials can be found in the Handbook of procedures for the Diploma Programme. Students are required to indicate the length of the video recording and the number of words used when the materials are submitted. Where submitted materials exceed the prescribed time or word limits examiners are instructed to base their assessment solely on the materials that appear within the limits.